Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Associates in Urology
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Preferred Capital, Inc., appeals the district court Order granting Defendant, Associates in Urology’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The district court found that the forum selection clause in the contract between Defendant and Plaintiff, whose interest was assigned to Plaintiff by non-party NorVergence, was unenforceable for being unjust. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the district court improperly found the forum selection clause to be invalid, and erred in granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Lisa Dean v. Motel 6 Operating L.P. Motel 6 G.P., Inc. Accor North America Corporation and Accor S.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Tryg International Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Wong v. PartyGaming Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Lakeside Surfaces, Inc. v. Cambria Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Rucker v. Oasis Legal Finance, L.L.CCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Firexo, Inc. v. Firexo Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Stryker Corporation v. Christopher RidgewayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.