Legal Opinion

National Typographic Co. v. New York Typograph Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided March 11, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

That the machines manufactured and sold by .the defendants may be lighter, smaller, cheaper, more easily operated, and more efficient; that they may be a decided improvement on the Mergenthaler machine, and may, as such, commend themselves more readily to the public; that they are themselves patented, and that, if put in open competition with the earlier machines, they would prove more attractive to purchasers and users, — each of which points is pressed with great force by the defendants, — is wholly immaterial, if the complainants’ main contention is a sound one,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  2. New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1910
  4. Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
  5. Maunula v. SunellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API