National Typographic Co. v. New York Typograph Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Lacombe, Circuit Judge.
That the machines manufactured and sold by .the defendants may be lighter, smaller, cheaper, more easily operated, and more efficient; that they may be a decided improvement on the Mergenthaler machine, and may, as such, commend themselves more readily to the public; that they are themselves patented, and that, if put in open competition with the earlier machines, they would prove more attractive to purchasers and users, — each of which points is pressed with great force by the defendants, — is wholly immaterial, if the complainants’ main contention is a sound one,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
- New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1894
- Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1910
- Keasbey & Mattison Co. v. Philip Carey Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
- Maunula v. SunellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.