Legal Opinion

New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided November 16, 1894No. 748PublishedCited by 17 opinions

This wna a bill in equity by the .New Departure Bell Company against the Bevin Bros. Manufacturing’ Company to restrain the infringement of certain letters patent, and for an accounting.

1Opinion of the Court

Tí) WXiSEXD, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity for an injunction and accounting by reason of the alleged infringement of patents No. 456,002, dated July 14, 1891, and Nos. 471,982 and *860471,983, dated March 29, 1892, and all granted to E. D. Rockwell, the manager of and assignor to the complainant corporation, all of said patents being for improvements in bells. They relate specifically to the striking mechanism in the class of bells which give forth a continuous ring, thus producing a sound resembling that of an electric bell. The defendant’s .bell is adapted for use as an alarm bell…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Ide v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. J. L. Owens Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Anderson v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. McDONOUGH v. JOHNSON-WENTWORTH CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API