Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maheu v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark, Dept. No. 6

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1972No. 6663Published

1Dissent

Mowbray, L,

dissenting:

Respectfully, I must object to the issuance of the writs of prohibition and mandamus ordered by the court in its opinion filed today. Nevada precedent, in my opinion, does not support the ruling of the court.

The background of this litigation may be summarized as follows: Petitioner Maheu was the chief executive of Hughes Nevada Operations, which comprised all of Hughes Tool Company’s business activities in Nevada. On December 4, 1970, Maheu was relieved of that position. Immediately, he sought and obtained a temporary restraining order prohibiting those seeking his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  3. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. BordaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Mears v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API