Legal Opinion

Anders v. CSU, Fresno

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 10, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00179Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Taylor Anders, et al., No. 1:21-cv-00179 KIM BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 California State University, Fresno, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs bring a putative class action lawsuit against defendants, including Fresno State, 18 | alleging Fresno State violated Title IX by not effectively accommodating female varsity athletes 19 | and by not giving them equal treatment. They seek an injunction that requires Fresno State to 20 | abide by Title IX. Two motions are pending before the court.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API