Legal Opinion

United States v. Sauceda

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2002No. 01-2340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*323 ORDER

Juan Armando Sauceda appeals from his judgment of convictions and sentence. The parties have waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1999, a jury convicted Sauceda of conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Sauceda to 240 months of imprisonment. On appeal, this court affirmed Sauceda’s convictions, but vacated his sentence in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Randy GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Neil E. Campbell Paul Carpenter Rickey D. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Juan Antonio Martinez (99-2025) Juan Armando Sauceda (99-2027)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. Head, Unpublished Decision (6-1-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API