Legal Opinion

Santistevan v. Centinel Bank of Taos

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1980No. 4413Published

1Opinion of the Court

634 P.2d 1286 (1980)

96 N.M. 734

Gilbert

v.

SANTISTEVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CENTINEL BANK OF TAOS, Eliu E. Romero and Bert Quintana, Defendants-Appellees, and

CIT Financial Services Corporation, Rio Costilla Cooperative Livestock Association, State of New Mexico, and Gloria V. Santistevan Vigil, Defendants.

No. 4413.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

November 6, 1980.

Robert Dale Morrison, Taos, for plaintiff-appellant.

John F. McCarthy, Jr., White, Koch, Kelly & McCarthy, Santa Fe, Eliu E. Romero, Taos, pro se, Lynn Pickard, Pickard & Singleton, Santa Fe, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

T…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Georgia Southern and Florida Railway Company v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Novak v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API