Legal Opinion
Mundry v. Great American Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 6, 1966No. Civ. No. 10242PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs instituted this diversity action to enforce a judgment of $10,242.-00 they obtained in the State of New York against Michael and Anna Istvan, the defendant’s insureds. Although the defendant insurer contested the negligence case to a verdict in New York, it claims exemption from paying the judgment on the ground the insureds breached the cooperation clause of the automobile liability policy issued to them by the defendant.
The instant case was scheduled for trial before this Court and a jury on November 2, 1965. As the issues were framed by the pleadings,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- McDanels v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roy Mundry and Charlotte Mundry v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966