Northeast Shoe Co. v. Industrial & Recreational Finance Approval Board
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.
On report. This is a complaint for a declaratory judgment and relief in the nature of mandamus by the Northeast Shoe Co., Inc., the plaintiff, against the Industrial and Recreational Finance Approval Board [the Board], a public instrumentality established under Section 5327 of the “Muni cipal Industrial and Recreational Obligations Act” (the Act), and Frank G. Chapman, its acting manager. Rule 57, M.R.C.P. (declaratory judgment); Rule 80B, M.R. C.P. (review of administrative action); First Manf’rs Nat’l Bk. et al. v. Johnson, 161 Me. 369, 212 A.2d 840; 30 M.R.S.A. §§…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hooper v. EmerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- City of Bangor v. PeirceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- FIRST MANUFACTURERS NATIONAL BANK OF LEWISTON AND AUBURN v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Inhabitants of Concord v. DelaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berry v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Wilmington Medical Center, Inc. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978