Legal Opinion

Northeast Shoe Co. v. Industrial & Recreational Finance Approval Board

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 19, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

On report. This is a complaint for a declaratory judgment and relief in the nature of mandamus by the Northeast Shoe Co., Inc., the plaintiff, against the Industrial and Recreational Finance Approval Board [the Board], a public instrumentality established under Section 5327 of the “Muni cipal Industrial and Recreational Obligations Act” (the Act), and Frank G. Chapman, its acting manager. Rule 57, M.R.C.P. (declaratory judgment); Rule 80B, M.R. C.P. (review of administrative action); First Manf’rs Nat’l Bk. et al. v. Johnson, 161 Me. 369, 212 A.2d 840; 30 M.R.S.A. §§…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. EmerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  3. City of Bangor v. PeirceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  4. FIRST MANUFACTURERS NATIONAL BANK OF LEWISTON AND AUBURN v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  5. Inhabitants of Concord v. DelaneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API