Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2015No. 14-4089PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), a district court order remanding a case to state court is “not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” Notwithstanding this apparently clear language, federal courts have frequently wrestled with the question of whether the “not reviewable” language of § 1447(d) genuinely precludes appellate review of a remand order. We hold that a district court order remanding because the defendants did not unanimously join or consent to removal is patently “not reviewable.” Further, we conclude that the remand order in this case was colorably characterized as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Perfect Puppy, Inc. v. City of East ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Peter Protopapas v. Travelers Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Kakarala v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Anderson v. GriswoldDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API