Legal Opinion
Associated Students for University of California at Riverside v. Attorney General
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 28, 1973No. 72-1327-FPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before CARTER, Circuit Judge, and EAST and FERGUSON, District Judges. FERGUSON, District Judge:
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief and relief in the nature of mandamus. The plaintiffs seek to invalidate (a) those portions of 18 U.S.C. § 1461 which provide that information concerning abortion is “nonmailable matter” and make the knowing use of the mails for such matter a crime, and (b) the provisions of § 1461 which, together with 39 U.S.C. § 3001(e), make the mailing of unsolicited advertisements of birth control devices a crime. 1 Plaintiffs contend that,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Margaret S. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- United States v. MosesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sanger v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- United Farm Workers National Union v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.