Legal Opinion
United Farm Workers National Union v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 20, 1978No. Civ. 72-445 PHX-CAMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs filed this action for declaratory and injunctive relief together with an application for a three-judge court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 28 U.S.C. § 2201, et seq., seeking to have Arizona’s Agricultural Employment Relations Act (AERA), A.R.S. §§ 23-1381, et seq., declared unconstitutional.
Plaintiffs in this action are the United Farm Workers National Union (U.F.W.), on behalf of itself and its members; Gustavo Gutierrez, an agent of the U.F.W. in the State of Arizona; Ruben Alaniz and…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Bruce Church, Inc. v. United Farm Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United Farm Workers of America v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.