Legal Opinion

Marchioro v. Chaney

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1979No. 78-647PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Since 1927, a Washington statute has required each major political party to have a State Committee consisting of two persons from each county in the State. The question pre sented by this appeal is whether the Washington Supreme Court correctly held that this statute does not violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

The powers of the Democratic State Committee are derived from two sources: the authorizing statute and the Charter of the Democratic Party of Washington. The statute gives the State Committee the power to call conventions, to provide for the election of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cousins v. WigodaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marchioro v. ChaneyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fahey v. DariganDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Blair v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Southwest Washington Chapter, National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API