Legal Opinion

Panos v. Nefflen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1964No. 3556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellant’s automobile was struck and damaged by an automobile driven by appel-lee. Appellant sued for $1,200.16 compensatory damages, $1,000 punitive damages, and $700 attorney’s fee. Service of process was obtained on appellee, a nonresident, under our Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act. 1 Appellee’s answer admitted the happening of the accident but denied negligence. The answer further asserted that appellee had offered $900 in settlement of the claim, but this offer had been refused by appellant. Thereafter appellant took the deposition of appellee. Some ten months…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Shima v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Gamlen Chemical Co. v. Dacar Chemical Products Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Trilon Plaza Co. v. Allstate Leasing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Robinson v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Ingber v. RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Talley v. VarmaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API