Jubas v. Sampsell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
_ATC _. . , STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, ’ J
The court’s Findings of Fact are to the following purport and are unquestioned:
A copartnership composed of Gene L J ‘ f FaíTan. and Leo G- 01son was conducting a retail shoe business under the fictitious name of Fashion Bootery. The copartnership was adjudged a bankrupt and plaintiff-appellee thereafter became Trustee jn Bankruptcy. While yet solvent, the COpartnership sold 1240 pairs of shoes « . , , , £ which were of broken sizes and out of , ^ _ stylc: Tbey had “st betwcen $5'25 and $^*25 per pair and defendant-appellant purchased them for their then…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schainman v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Markwell & Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murdock v. Plymouth Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Curtina International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Curtis B. Danning, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Daylin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Roberts v. NorrellDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
- Reed v. Anglo Scandinavian CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.