Legal Opinion

Schainman v. Dean

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1928No. 5243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

Section 3440 of the Civil Code of California provides that the sale, transfer, or assignment' of a stock in trade, in hnlk, or a substantial part thereof otherwise than in the ordinary course of trade, and in the regular and usual practice and method of business of the vendor, transferor, or assignor, and the sale, transfer, assignment, or mortgage of the fixtures or store equipment of a baker, cafe or restaurant owner, garage owner, machinist, or retail or wholesale merchant, will be conclusively presumed to be fraudulent and void as against the existing creditors of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanders v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Brainard v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Calkins v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mack v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Klein v. TabatchnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Towers v. TitusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. James B. Kelley and Lena S. Kelley, and John Waltman and Doris WaltmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re Verco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API