Crowder v. Department of Social Security
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the action of the King county welfare department *783in terminating, as of January 1, 1952, the old age assistance grant of Daisy Crowder was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.
Prior to July 16, 1947, Daisy Crowder and William E. Crowder, her husband, now deceased, were receiving old age assistance grants from the state of Washington. On that date, they mortgaged their residence property to Seattle First National Bank, Seattle, Washington, for the sum of forty-five hundred dollars. They gave the proceeds of this mortgage loan to a son, E. L.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Swanson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Pierson v. BillSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Halvorson v. MullinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stokes v. PolleyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Sannerud v. First National Bank of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Stokes v. PolleyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Kanda v. ChangDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.