Legal Opinion
Kanda v. Chang
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 18, 1979No. Civ. 77-0258PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, Chief Judge.
Defendants’ motion for summary judg-ment and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment require the court to pass upon the validity of the policies contained in Hawaii Public Welfare Manual (HPWM) § 3392, as interpreted and applied by the State Department of Social Services and Housing (DSSH), for evaluating the equity that applicants and recipients of Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) may have in their home property while receiving assistance. 1
Plaintiffs contend that the State’s definition of equity (1) is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKee v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Kilpatrick v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- McKee v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Roy v. Commissioner, Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985