Legal Opinion
Griepsma v. Andersen
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 3, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00302Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT TACOMA 6 JAMES DAVID GRIEPSMA, Case No. 2:21-cv-00302-RJB-TLF 7 Plaintiff, v. ORDER 8 CHRISTIAN J. ANDERSEN, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions for appointment of 12 counsel (Dkt. 8) and to demand trial by jury (Dkt. 9). 13 A. Motion to Demand Jury Trial (Dkt. 9) 14 Plaintiff has filed a “motion to demand jury trial.” Dkt. 9. Plaintiff’s motion is 15 unnecessary, as his complaint already contains a jury demand. Dkt. 1 at 1. Plaintiff’s 16 motion (Dkt. 9) is therefore…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Larry A. Storseth, 623435 v. John D. SpellmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.