Legal Opinion

Norris & Coleman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Criminal Court of Dallas. Tried before the Hon. Geo. H. Craig.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

The indictment was based on R. C. § 3695, and charged, in substance, that the defendants “ broke into and entered the house of Jerry Manning, in which there was stored at the time cotton in the seed, with intent to steal,” &c. A demurrer to it was overruled.

Section 3695 of the Revised Code divides the buildings which may be the subjects of burglary into two classes. In one class, the burglary is made to depend upon the character of the building, without reference to what is therein contained. In the other, the breaking and entering, with the felonious intent, does not necessarily constitute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Hurst v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Neal & Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API