Legal Opinion

Henderson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Circuit Court of Talladega. Tried before tlie ILon. Leroy F. Box.

1Opinion of the CourtSomeeville, J.

The indictment in this case is for the crime of burglary, as defined and prohibited by section 4343 of the Code of 1816. It charges that, before the finding of the *24indictment, George Henderson, the appellant, and one Henry Mattison, “broke into and entered the storehouse of Andrew J. Street, in which goods or merchandise were kept for use, sale, or deposit.”

The descriptive words of the statute are, “in which any goods, merchandise, or other valuable thing, is kept for use, sale or deposit.” The question of the sufficiency of indictments, framed under this section of the Code, has been ruled…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Spivey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
  4. People v. BillNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  5. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Burns v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Alabama Great Soiitliern Railroad v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API