Legal Opinion

Dormani v. Target Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 15, 2018No. 0:17-cv-04049Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ANN DORMANI, MITCHELL W. KNOLL, DAVID RIGOL, and DOROTHEA SIMMONS, on behalf of the Target Corporation 401(k) Plan, themselves, and a class consisting of similarly situated participants of the Plan, Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-4049 (JNE/SER) v. ORDER TARGET CORPORATION, SCOTT KENNEDY, MICHAEL FIDDELKE, PLAN INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, JOHN MULLIGAN, COREY HAALAND, JODEE KOZLAK, BETH JACOB, JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, and GREGG STEINHAFEL, Defendants. Michael Jason Klein, Stull, Stull & Brody; David Krause, David E. Krause Law Office; and Gregory…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API