Legal Opinion
Widger v. CENT. SCH. DIST. NO. 1 OF THE TOWNS OF ELLICOTTVILLE
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order appealed from should be reversed insofar as it dismisses the causes of action pleaded against the school district. The second amended complaint states causes of action against the school board because at the time the second amended complaint was served both, the period in which a notice of claim had to be filed and the 30-day period in which the claim could have been settled without an action had passed (Education Law, § 3813; General Municipal Law, § 50-i). The notice of claim sufficiently informed the school district of the nature of the claim, of the time when, the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rivero v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Brown v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Grasso v. Schenectady County Public LibraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Deposit Central School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Almar Construction Corp. v. P. M. Hughes & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.