Legal Opinion
Adams v. Webb
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 1924No. 12921PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
The only question presented by this proceeding is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the motion of the defendant to strike the amended petition of the plaintiff from the files of said cause.
By Comp. Stmt. 1921, sec. 315, it is provided :
“The plaintiff, may amend his petition without leave, at any time before the answer is filed, without prejudice to the proceedings, but notice of such amendment shall be served upon the defendant or his attorney, and the defendant shall have the same time to answer or demur thereto as to the original petition.”
This statute has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- First National Bank v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Wade v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Hocker v. RackleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hailey v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pleasant v. Allen Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Bronson v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Monarch Lumber Co. v. HaggardMontana Supreme Court · 1961
- Waldock v. State Ex Rel. FinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Boyer v. CrichtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.