Village of Moscow v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Clermont County Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtRingland, J.
This matter came on to be heard pursuant to an appeal under R.C. 4141.28(0). Appellant, the village of Moscow, has designated three assignments of error in respect to the referee’s decision awarding unemployment compensation benefits to Dennis Skeene, a former employee of the village. Ap-pellees are the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, the Administrator of the Bureau of Employment Services, and Skeene.
The facts in the record indicate that Skeene applied for unemployment benefits at the Georgetown office of the Ohio Bureau of Employment Services (“OBES”) on March 8, 1984, the day…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. JarmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Holmes v. Union Gospel PressOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- McCruter v. Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Proctor v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kowalski v. Kowalski Heat Treating, Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987