Lorsch & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8024 (T. D. 36999). [Oral argument Dee. 11,1917, by Mr. washburn and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The merchandise here in suit consists of strings of imitation pearl beads selected and graded as to size so that the beads graduate from the largest in the center to the smallest at either end. The controversy involves their proper dutiable classification under respective portions of paragraph 333 of the tariff act of 1913, which reads:
333. Beads and spangles of all kinds, including imitation pearl beads, not threaded or strung, or strung loosely on thread for facility in transportation only, 35 per centum ad valorem; curtains and other articles not embroidered nor appliquéd and not specially…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Neresheimer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- D. Lisner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- United States v. BattiloroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Frankel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963