Legal Opinion

Louis Ancel and Harriet Ancel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 15, 1968No. 16668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Chief Judge.

Louis Ancel and Harriet Ancel, the plaintiffs-appellants, commenced this action in the District Court seeking to recover a refund of $18,334.66 .from the government. Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1). The amount sought represents income tax deficiencies assessed against plaintiffs as transferees of Carleton Hotel Corporation and Carleton Motor Inn, Inc. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that in August of 1963, the plaintiffs paid to the Internal Revenue Service “the said tax assessment in the sum of $18,334.66 plus interest”, and that a claim for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. A. S. Kreider Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. William England and Mary England v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  4. Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Jeromer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frank Angelo Bruno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Robin & Diane Miller, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Joseph I. Swietlik, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen v. Safran, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Wertz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Strick Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API