City of Petaluma v. White
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to recover for the use of the public as a part of a street, a strip of land about seven and one half feet wide, extending along the front of the lot of defendant White a distance of about one hundred and fifty feet. Defendant White had judgment, and plaintiff made a motion for a new trial. The motion was granted, and this appeal is from the order granting such motion.
The defendant’s lot is a portion of block 186 of the city of Petaluma, according to the official map of said city. This land has a frontage of about one hundred and fifty feet on the southerly line of the public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Application of WoolseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Ede v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Poundstone v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Alemany v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Pool v. BreeseIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Datig v. Dove Books, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Dodge v. FreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Robertson Lumber Co. v. ClarkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- International Harvester Co. of America v. EmbodyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.