Legal Opinion

Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Hoffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1933No. Docket No. 8054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

This case and that of Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Hoffman, Civil No. 8050, this day decided (ante, p. 601 [25 Pac. (2d) 1006]), were instituted, tried and appealed at the same time by the same parties and questions argued in both need not be here restated. The former related to the real property, and the latter to personalty consisting of the furniture and furnishings contained therein, of all of which the appellant was in possession.

The first ground of appeal herein concerns the validity of the chattel mortgage by which said personal property was encumbered. In an instance cited by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. A. P. Hotaling & Co. v. BroganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. City of Petaluma v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Datig v. Dove Books, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. In Re KesslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  3. Security First National Bank v. HadenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. In re DriscollDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API