Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Imperial County v. Garey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1923No. Civ. No. 4145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the auditor of Imperial County to attest certain county bonds the issuance whereof had been authorized by the electors of the county voting at a special election called for that -purpose by the hoard of supervisors. Respondent bases his refusal to attest the bonds upon the ground that the election was not properly noticed.

The election was held under section 4088 of the Political Code. It is conceded that the notice which is specifically defined in that section was given. But it is claimed by respondent that the provisions of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  4. Felt v. FeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Stockett v. Bird's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Interinsurance Exchange v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API