Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Pike

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-05015Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION JESSIE S. PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:20-CV-05015-MDH ) ANDY PIKE, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendants Jennings’, Childers’, and Pooler’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 71). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND This is a claim in which pro se Plaintiff seeks recovery solely under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 17, ¶¶ 1, 2). Additionally, only individual capacity claims are asserted.

Id. at ¶ 9. The named Defendants are six members…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API