Legal Opinion

City of Kent v. Sandhu

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 7, 2011No. 63426-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 — A trial court does not necessarily abuse its discretion by dismissing a criminal case when a subpoenaed trial witness fails to appear at the scheduled time. In this case, the trial had previously been rescheduled when *838the same witness was absent without a reasonable excuse. The judge refused to delay the trial any longer and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

¶2 Respondent Davinder S. Sandhu was charged by the city of Kent with one count of assault in the fourth degree with sexual motivation. Arraignment in Kent Municipal Court was on February 11, 2008. At Sandhu’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KoerberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. ChichesterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. City of Bellevue v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Mahadi H. AljaffarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State Of Washington v. Bryant JietaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Kenneth Allen ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington, V. Denver Mckay BraggCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State Of Washington, V. Shamarr D. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API