Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Mahadi H. Aljaffar

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 2017No. 33171-7-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPennell, J.

¶1 Being a court interpreter involves more than the ability to speak two languages. Court interpretation is a specialized skill, requiring not only language proficiency but also the ability to relay information between court participants so non-English speakers are placed on substantially equal footing with their English speaking counterparts. Washington law recognizes the importance of high quality court interpretation. Under the court interpreter statute, when a non-English speaker is involved in a proceeding, the court must appoint a certified interpreter unless good cause justifies the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Bryant JietaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington v. Samuel MatamuaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  3. State Of Washington v. Fen Shou ChenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Samuel MatamuaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State Of Washington v. Zahid Aziz KhanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API