Legal Opinion

Moore v. Booher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 20, 2001No. 01-6230Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Curtis Vane Moore, a state prisoner in the custody of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We agree with the district court that three of Mr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gibson v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API