Legal Opinion

United States v. 6960 Miraflores Avenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 27, 1993No. 90-5295PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before KRAVITCH and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge. DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:

In this action by the government for forfeiture of residential premises pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7), the district court denied the innocent ownership claim of the mortgagee Republic National Bank. We conclude that an incorrect standard was applied to measure Republic’s conduct and that the court relied on clearly erroneous findings of fact. We reverse.

*1560 Statement of the Issue

Whether the district court correctly applied the actual…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. One Single Family Residence Located At 6960 Miraflores AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. One Parcel of Real EstateDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
  3. United States v. One Parcel of Real EstateDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
  4. No. 93-5139Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API