Legal Opinion

Ortloff v. O'Brien

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 6, 2001No. 00-3396Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Despite federal inmate Robert Ortloffs eligibility for parole, the United States Parole Commission concluded after a hearing that he was a much more serious risk than the Commission’s guidelines indicated and continued his parole hearing for fifteen years. Ortloff, who believes that the Commission is under political pressure to deny him parole, petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court denied relief. Ortloff appeals, arguing that Commission should have set his release date and that its failure to do so violated the Ex Post Facto…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,783 Willie Green, III v. Whiteco Industries, Inc. And Joel J. NygraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. William J. Prater v. U.S. Parole Commission and Thomas Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Mark R. Stewart A/K/A Mark JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Joseph Veston Lightsey v. D.C. KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Anant Kumar Tripati v. United States Parole Commission, Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API