Legal Opinion
Anant Kumar Tripati v. United States Parole Commission, Gary L. Henman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1989No. 87-2934PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Anant Tripati, a federal prisoner, was convicted of nine counts of banking violations, and sentenced on January 6, 1984, to a ten-year prison term. On May 4, 1984, the United States Parole Commission (USPC) ruled that Tripati would be eligible for parole on July 16, 1989, after he had been in custody for seventy-two months.
Tripati petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that the USPC had exceeded the suggested parole guidelines of 28 C.F.R. § 2.20, which would have provided for parole in forty to fifty-two months. The district court ruled that the USPC had good…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vermouth v. CorrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Joseph Veston Lightsey v. D.C. KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Charles Denton Watson v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles Denton Watson v. Wayne EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robert C. Evenstad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- James Lyons v. Jake Mendez, Warden Us Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- John Richard Skowronek v. Edward G. Brennan, David Olushina John v. Edward G. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Michael Norwood v. Edward BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.