Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Meade

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2017No. 15-5723/5852UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.

The convictions in this case arose from the disguise and resale of stolen motorcycles. A jury found the defendants, Richard Meade and Mark Justice, guilty of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); concealing the proceeds of unlawful activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i); and possessing vehicle parts with altered vehicle identification numbers (VINs), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2321. The defendants appeal, alleging principally that the indictment was invalid and that the district court made various…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Atrel Howard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Kendrick ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. William SchureckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. William SchureckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API