Legal Opinion

Burwell v. Gaylord

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1912No. Nos. 17,725—(52)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $200 upon a promissory note. Erom an order, Montgomery, L, overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Suit on a promissory note. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled and defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges that one George W. Hale, on October 8, 1908, executed and delivered his promissory note whereby he promised to pay to the order of defendant herein $200 in six months from date, with interest. It is then alleged that before delivery of the note, defendant, for value, indorsed his name thereon for the pur*427pose of giving credit thereto and inducing plaintiff to accept the same, and that plaintiff did accept and is the holder of the note. It is also alleged that at maturity the note,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Dubois v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  3. Porter v. Winona & Dakota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Barnard v. GaslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  5. Dennis v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Central Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Wistrom v. ForslingNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Goodhue County National Bank v. EkbladSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. McCrae v. SpiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API