Legal Opinion

Silverman v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about March 10, 1997, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the supplemental amended derivative complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff did not have standing to prosecute a derivative action on behalf of the corporate defendant Loral Space and Communications Limited since the claims plaintiff sought to bring in a derivative capacity were not properly the claims of Loral Space but rather those of the Loral Corporation, an entity of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rubinstein v. CatacosinosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Rubinstein v. CatacosinosNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meng v. SchwartzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Dooner v. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Lichtenberg v. Besicorp Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Balk v. 125 West 92nd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Ciullo v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API