Legal Opinion
Rubinstein v. Catacosinos
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Samuel J. Silverman at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 445).
In so ruling, we deem it necessary to add the following comments. First, section 906 of the Business Corporation Law is not one of the enumerated laws specifically applicable to foreign corporations doing business in New York (Business Corporation Law, § 1319, subd [a]). Second, inasmuch as it is concluded that plaintiff had no standing to continue this shareholder’s derivative action,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Diamond v. OreamunoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Rubinstein v. CatacosinosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Diamond v. OreamunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by14 opinions
- Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Friedman v. Mohasco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Dooner v. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Maldonado v. DiBreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. GrassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.