Legal Opinion
Matesic v. Maleski
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 20, 1993No. 301 M.D. 1992PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Cynthia Maleski, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commissioner), has filed preliminary objections to the petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus filed in this court’s original jurisdiction 1 by Robert Matesic, Stella Zabieliski, Mirko LuMsie, Rita Steigerwald, James Sweeney and Laverne Sweeney (Petitioners). For the reasons which follow, the petition for review is dismissed.
Petitioners, with the exception of Robert Matesic, are policy holders of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Western Pennsylvania 65 Plus Plan. Matesic planned to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Canonsburg General Hospital v. Department of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance Companies v. Argonaut InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by19 opinions
- Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Petsinger v. Department of Labor & Industry, Office of Vocational RehabilitationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pennsylvania Pharmacists Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Mcgill v. Pennsylvania Department of HealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Byrd v. PA. Board of Probation/ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.