Legal Opinion

Bridges v. McClenaghan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1943No. 6622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this suit plaintiff is seeking to recover $420, alleged to be the balance of wages due him by defendant for services rendered as production foreman, pumper and other oil field work on a well owned by the defendant in Section 18, Township 21 North, Range 16 West, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, covering a period of time from January 1, 1941, to September 20, 1941. He alleged that his wages were fixed at the rate of $9 per day, seven days per week.

Plaintiff further alleged he made demands on the day he ceased his employment with defendant for his past due salary at the place and places where he was…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Stephen Lanier, Jr. v. Alenco, a Division of Redman Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Tuberville v. FosterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Sifers v. Exxon Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Miletello v. Noble Drilling CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Fahed v. AyeshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API