Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Borczon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 This appeal asks us to determine the scope of the Mental Health Procedures Act (“MHPA” or “the Act”), 50 P.S. §§ 7101-7503, as applied to the facts of this case; whether Catherine Elizabeth Walsh (“patient”) has pled facts sufficient to withstand Dennis Borczon, M.D.’s (“physician’s”), and St. Vincent Hospital’s (“hospital’s”) motions for summary judgment based upon the qualified immunity the Act affords mental health care providers unless they have committed gross negligence; and whether patient has waived her challenge to physician’s claim to a qualified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Albright v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Majorsky v. DouglasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Keffer v. Bob Nolan's Auto Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. A. Richard Kacin, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. O'Kelly v. DawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Rohrer v. PopeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API