Legal Opinion · Dissent

Battaglia v. Battaglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 24, 1982Published

1Dissent

Mahoney, P. J., and Levine, J.,

dissent and vote to reverse in the following memorandum by Levine, J. Levine, J. (dissenting). Undeniably, neither a complaint nor answer was ever served in this action. Therefore, under the clearly expressed language of CPLR 3217 (subd [a], par 1), plaintiff had the absolute and unconditional right to discontinue her action without seeking judicial permission through a court order, merely through the service of the notice upon defendant. This drastically distinguishes the instant case from Pollack v Pollack (56 NY2d 968), Zuckerman v Zuckerman (56 NY2d 636),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Winans v. . WinansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Valladares v. ValladaresNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Valladares v. ValladaresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Pollack v. PollackNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API