Legal Opinion

Pollack v. Pollack

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1982PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative. The Legislature has determined that the controlling factor with respect to the applicability of the Equitable Distribution Law (Domestic Relations Law, § 236, part B) to pre-existing causes of action is not the date on which issue was joined, or the possibility that the party may be the type of person the law was generally intended to benefit, but the date on which the action was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Valladares v. ValladaresNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Zuckerman v. ZuckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. LaRue v. LaRueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Battaglia v. BattagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Parry v. ParryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Mamet v. MametAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API