Legal Opinion

State v. Rice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1974No. 7417SC719PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

All of defendant’s assignments of error relate to the court’s refusal to delay defendant’s trial in order to obtain defendant’s *185witnesses and in the use of the stipulation that the witnesses, if present, would corroborate defendant’s testimony.

Although not denominated as such, we treat the colloquy set out in the record between the defendant and the court as a denial of motions to continue and to reopen the case for the introduction of additional testimony.

It is well settled in this State that a motion to continue is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. ShuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API