Legal Opinion

State v. Butcher

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1976No. 766SC530Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The defendant contends that the trial court committed error in denying his motion for a continuance on the ground of the absence of a subpoenaed witness. The defendant asserts that in so doing the trial court abused its discretion and denied his constitutional rights to confrontation and to compulsory process.

The trial record reveals that the defendant’s witness, Timothy Butcher, did not appear at trial to testify. However, what he would have testified to had he appeared was read to the jury on the basis of a stipulation made by the State. This stipulation appears in the record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API