Legal Opinion
Hogan v. QT CORPORATION
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 16, 1962No. [No. 58, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHornby, J.
In this action by a broker for commissions claimed to have been earned in bringing about the lease of a store property in or near the Queenstown Shopping Center in Prince George’s County to the Southland Corporation for a “Seven-Eleven Store,” the jury rendered a verdict for the broker (Earl V. Hogan) against the owner of the leased property (Q. T. Corporation). But the lower court granted the motion of the owner for judgment n.o.v., and entered a judgment in its favor against the broker. And the broker appealed.
On appeal, the only question presented by the broker is whether there was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Joffre v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Beck v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Heslop v. DieudonneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Leimbach v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Prudential Insurance v. ShumakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- St. Paul at Chase Corp. v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Gebhard v. GebhardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Sanborn v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.