Carl Miller Lumber Co. v. Meyer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 15, 1924:
Jones, J.
It is argued by plaintiff’s counsel that the terms of the agreement did not bind the plaintiff since it was made and signed in the name of Charles Miller. The material was all furnished by the plaintiff and not by Charles Miller, its president. We do not regard the form of the contract as conclusive. The plaintiff by its acceptance of the agreement, acting on it, and bringing the suit for the value of the materials, adopted the agreement as its own. We are convinced by the testimony that the president was acting as the. agent of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- McMurray v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Central Trust Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Gardner v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Eclipse Lumber Co. v. BitlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Usiak v. KubiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Stolze Lumber Co. v. OglesbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932